|
|
|
Published : December 07, 2006 |
Author : Poseidon
Category : Entertainment | Total Views
: 97 | Rating :     
|
|
|
|
This
month's issue of The New Yorker features an article about a man who
needs no introduction: Charles Darwin. Of course, these days it's a
breath of fresh air to read anything about the man that isn't tinged
with the sour taste of the scool board debates, so I plunged in eagerly.
 The
interesting thing about this article, though, is that it deals only
nominally with Darwin's scientific achievements, and instead focuses on
the man as an author. The writer Adam Gopnik describes the major plot
arcs developed throughout The Origin of Species, and describes with
obviously loving care the deliberate specificity with which Darwin
builds to a climax as earth-shaking and original as any in fiction.
On
to The Descent of Man, where Gopnik lauds Darwin's restraint in filling
page after page with seemingly unconnected data- everything from the
sizes of elephants' tusks to the mating rituals of birds-before
dropping on us his infamous conclusion:
We
thus learn that man is descended from a hairy quadruped, furnished with
a tail and pointed ears, probably arboreal in its habits, and an
inhabitant of the Old World. Of
course, all these chapters of meticulously-researched lab data add up
to a climax that emerged out of the woodwork, almost while the reader
wasn't looking. "Look! Up in that tree! It's your great-grandfather!"
All along the ride we've been with him, until at last we arrive at the
destination and realize we aren't so sure about staying there. Do I
even need to specify which Lovecraft quote applies here? I believe I
will:
The
most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the
human mind to correlate all its contents. We live on a placid island of
ignorance in the midst of black seas of infinity, and it was not meant
that we should voyage far. Though
Darwin would probably disagree with the final clause there, the
conclusion remains a valid one: when a man ventures beyond the veils to
which he's grown accustomed, what he finds outside will, like the
haunted Scottish mountain Ben MacDhui, either drive him insane or turn
him into a brilliant writer. Luckily, we've had some truly excellent
examples of the latter in the past two centuries.
Thus far,
we're all in agreement; Darwin was a surprisingly talented sculptor of
plot and revelation, which we'd never much considered before. The
article took on a further dimension, however, when I realized what
Gopnik seemed to be implying: that slow builds and miniscule facts,
accumulated over vast lengths of pages, are a major factor in the
quality of a piece of literature.
This was soon confirmed by his
praise of Elliot and Trollope, in which he emphasizes both authors'
talents for causing us to focus on the minutae of their worlds, to
dwell in the "small pastures" and "cozy kennels" for innumerable
chapters, until at last we are granted the boon of insight into the
story, and perhaps a surprising twist on occasion.
Last I checked, these were all hallmarks of the realist and naturalist movements, and their related trends in 19th century literature, including the dreaded three-volume novel. As Clive Barker said in this marvelous impromptu speech, those trends, so highly venerated today, are little more than a hiccup in the timeline of all literature in history.
Don't
get me wrong; I'm not lobbying for two-hundred-page breakneck adventure
novels to supplant Dickens and Tolstoy. Just remember that a great deal
of the raw power of Lovecraft, Bloch,
and their ilk lies in the unrelenting constancy with which they pour in
the unsettling, the shocking, and at last, the revelatory.
Hence
the title of this article: there are a great many 19th century authors
whose work I truly value, and I understand the dramatic force that can
be generated by the gradual unfolding of a tale. I also own a great
many books of weird tales that are special to me because of their
efficiency and baldness in revealing their secrets.
My opinion,
for what it's worth, is that if you're writing to prove a point, as
Darwin was, steady accumulation of evidence is likely the best way to
go about it. For my money, though, I'll take rocketing flights of
bizarre imagery over a chapter on the consistency of soup any day. |
|
|
Visitor's Comments ! |
|
|
|
Random Pick |
Your life is an ongoing and changing outlook of events. While many people feel that we are all just by products of our situations or by products of a society, life is really what you make it. If you were to feel that every thing in life is always going to go bad, or that you are never going to have good luck, the chances are that you are not going to have good luck or that you are going to have things that you want in life. |
|
|
Statistics |
| » Total Articles |
749
|
| » Total Authors |
7534
|
| » Total Views |
127047
|
| » Total categories |
23
|
|